The United States Postal Service will cut Saturday delivery in an attempt to save about $2 billion a year.
The company is expected to say the changes will go into effect in August in an announcement that is scheduled for late Wednesday.
The cuts, which will end a 150-year long tradition of Saturday delivery, came after the USPS reportedly lost $16 billion last year as more Americans have turned to private shippers, email and online banking, CBS news noted.
According to Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., the shift will save the company about $2 billion a year. “It’s a proper business decision and [in the] long run, good for the Postal Service and good for Americans,” he said.
The USPS has been struggling for a long time, and even with their past efforts to cut service hours in 26,000 offices and to lay off 35 percent of its workforce, the company has lost $41 billion over the past six years.
Over the past five years the Postal Service has unsuccessfully appealed to Congress for a switch to a five-day delivery model. It is not yet clear how they will eliminate Saturday mail without Congress’ approval, CS Monitor noted.
Coburn told CBS that the move wasn’t an attempt to force Congress to take action, but a desperate act for survival.
“They’re in survival mode,” he explained. “You’re not going to have any post office. I mean, here’s the alternative: They’re losing $25 million dollars a day. A day. They have to do something” (source).
Editor’s Note: Stamps go up in price, but service goes down and now they are closing on Saturdays. What do you think, will this work or maore cuts to come?
Submit your newstip or news photos
... HW t-shirt and cup...
.. the Harlem Division tee...
...and The Big Apple Harlem photograph, Harlem World Magazine has the classic photos of Harlem. Order Print »
In this grand pattern of things you actually get an A+ for hard work. Exactly where you lost us ended up being in the specifics. As as the maxim goes, the devil is in the details… And that could not be much more correct here. Having said that, let me inform you just what exactly did give good results. The article (parts of it) is definitely highly convincing and this is probably the reason why I am taking the effort in order to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, whilst I can certainly see the leaps in logic you make, I am definitely not sure of how you appear to connect your ideas that produce your conclusion. For now I shall yield to your point however trust in the foreseeable future you link your dots better.